- The Pennsylvania Supreme Court overturned the sex assault conviction of Bill Cosby
- The high court tossed the comedian's conviction for assaulting Andrea Constand because of a non-prosecution agreement Cosby had with a prior prosecutor, who later represented former President Donald Trump at his second impeachment trial.
- Cosby is set to be released from prison because of the ruling, which bars him from being tried again in the case.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court on Wednesday overturned Bill Cosby's sex assault conviction, setting the stage for the release of the 83-year-old comedian later in the day.
The state's highest court tossed Cosby's conviction as a result of an agreement he had with a prior prosecutor that would have prevented Cosby from being criminally charged in the case.
The ruling bars any retrial in the case, court documents say.
Cosby is two years into a three-to-10-year prison term.
Cosby's spokesman Andrew Wyatt, who traveled to the prison to get Cosby, said, "We want to thank the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. This is what we have been fighting for and this is justice and justice for black America."
"This is the justice Mr. Cosby has been fighting for. They saw the light," Wyatt said, according to NBC News. "He was given a deal and he had immunity. He should have never been charged."
Cosby was accused of drugging and molesting Andrea Constand, the former Temple University employee whose allegation was the basis of the criminal case, at his estate in 2004. He was charged in 2015 for the alleged attack and arrested just days before the 12-year statute of limitations expired. He was sentenced in 2018.
A written agreement from the previous Montgomery County prosecutor, Bruce Castor, stated that he would not criminally prosecute Cosby in the Constand case. Castor testified that while he was district attorney, he promised not to file criminal charges against the comedian if Cosby would testify in a civil lawsuit that was filed by Constand in 2005.
Castor had determined that the prosecution would have trouble corroborating forensic evidence without Cosby confessing to the alleged charges.
"Seeking 'some measure of justice' for Constand, D.A. Castor decided that the Commonwealth would decline to prosecute Cosby for the incident involving Constand, thereby allowing Cosby to be forced to testify in a subsequent civil action, under penalty of perjury, without the benefit of his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination," the court document said.
Cosby testified during four days of depositions by Constand's attorneys and the civil suit was settled for more than $3 million in 2006.
Criminal charges that resulted in Cosby's incarceration were brought in 2015 by Kevin Steele, who succeeded Castor as the county's district attorney. Castor is also known for defending former President Donald Trump in his second impeachment trial.
The supreme court's opinion also disagreed with the trial court judge's decision to let prosecutors call five other accusers in addition to Constand.
Originally, the trial judge had allowed just one other accuser to testify at Cosby's first trial. However, after the jury deadlocked, the judge then allowed five other accusers to testify at Cosby's retrial.
This testimony tainted the trial, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court said, even though the lower appeals court had found it appropriate to show a pattern of behavior.
The court ultimately did not address the admissibility of the five additional accusers because it had overturned the ruling based on the agreement with a former prosecutor that prevented Cosby from being criminally charged in the case.
"Having identified a due process violation here, we must ascertain the remedy to which Cosby is entitled," the court document stated.
Source: Read Full Article